<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 457 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358346</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the challenged orders and remitting the matter for reconsideration of the stay application. The Court emphasized the importance of providing sufficient reasoning and directed the second respondent to issue a speaking order after hearing the petitioner. The decision highlighted the need for a fair and expeditious resolution, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s opportunity to present their case lawfully.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:26:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 457 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358346</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the challenged orders and remitting the matter for reconsideration of the stay application. The Court emphasized the importance of providing sufficient reasoning and directed the second respondent to issue a speaking order after hearing the petitioner. The decision highlighted the need for a fair and expeditious resolution, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s opportunity to present their case lawfully.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>