<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 445 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358334</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all eight appeals of the Revenue, affirming that deemed dividend provisions under section 2(22)(e) do not apply if the recipient is not a shareholder of the lender company. Shareholders not directly receiving loans cannot be taxed under section 2(22)(e). Protective assessments under section 147 are not sustainable if they imply probable rather than confirmed escapement of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:26:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 445 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358334</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all eight appeals of the Revenue, affirming that deemed dividend provisions under section 2(22)(e) do not apply if the recipient is not a shareholder of the lender company. Shareholders not directly receiving loans cannot be taxed under section 2(22)(e). Protective assessments under section 147 are not sustainable if they imply probable rather than confirmed escapement of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>