<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 437 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358326</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the exclusion of certain companies from the final set of comparables, bringing the assessee&#039;s margins within an acceptable range. This decision resolved the primary issue of transfer pricing adjustment, rendering other grounds of appeal academic. The focus was on ensuring functional comparability and the availability of segmental details for selected comparables.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:26:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 437 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358326</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the exclusion of certain companies from the final set of comparables, bringing the assessee&#039;s margins within an acceptable range. This decision resolved the primary issue of transfer pricing adjustment, rendering other grounds of appeal academic. The focus was on ensuring functional comparability and the availability of segmental details for selected comparables.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>