<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 416 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358305</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order challenging the assessee&#039;s eligibility to utilize CENVAT credit for service tax payment as a recipient under the category of &#039;Goods Transport Agency&#039;. The High Court emphasized the need for a detailed examination in the absence of jurisdictional High Court&#039;s judgment, directing the Tribunal to rehear the appeal independently considering legislative changes and conflicting judicial precedents. The High Court highlighted the importance of assessing the impact of legislative amendments on earlier judicial orders and instructed a fresh hearing to keep all legal contentions open for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 17:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 416 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358305</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order challenging the assessee&#039;s eligibility to utilize CENVAT credit for service tax payment as a recipient under the category of &#039;Goods Transport Agency&#039;. The High Court emphasized the need for a detailed examination in the absence of jurisdictional High Court&#039;s judgment, directing the Tribunal to rehear the appeal independently considering legislative changes and conflicting judicial precedents. The High Court highlighted the importance of assessing the impact of legislative amendments on earlier judicial orders and instructed a fresh hearing to keep all legal contentions open for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>