<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1336 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200644</link>
    <description>The article explains that, after State reorganisation, the successor State may recover alleged tax arrears and be substituted in pending proceedings under the Reorganisation Act. It also notes that where the dispute concerns contested facts about whether luxury tax was actually collected, and an efficacious statutory appeal is available under the Luxuries Tax Act, writ jurisdiction may be declined in favour of the appellate remedy. Limitation objections cannot be considered in isolation where a higher court has granted liberty to proceed. The practical effect is that the taxpayer should pursue the statutory appeal while preserving its contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:22:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1336 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200644</link>
      <description>The article explains that, after State reorganisation, the successor State may recover alleged tax arrears and be substituted in pending proceedings under the Reorganisation Act. It also notes that where the dispute concerns contested facts about whether luxury tax was actually collected, and an efficacious statutory appeal is available under the Luxuries Tax Act, writ jurisdiction may be declined in favour of the appellate remedy. Limitation objections cannot be considered in isolation where a higher court has granted liberty to proceed. The practical effect is that the taxpayer should pursue the statutory appeal while preserving its contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>