<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (9) TMI 355 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200636</link>
    <description>Under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, property passes on an unconditional contract for specific goods in a deliverable state when the parties&#039; intention, contract terms and surrounding circumstances show that nothing further remains to be done by the seller. Here, the goods were identified, the price and goods were fixed by the sale notice and acceptance, and the materials were capable of delivery from the specified store yard; instalment terms, removal time and delay penalty did not convert the transaction into a mere agreement to sell. The contract was therefore a sale, title passed to the buyer, and the seller had no right to cancel or resell the balance goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 17:14:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (9) TMI 355 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200636</link>
      <description>Under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, property passes on an unconditional contract for specific goods in a deliverable state when the parties&#039; intention, contract terms and surrounding circumstances show that nothing further remains to be done by the seller. Here, the goods were identified, the price and goods were fixed by the sale notice and acceptance, and the materials were capable of delivery from the specified store yard; instalment terms, removal time and delay penalty did not convert the transaction into a mere agreement to sell. The contract was therefore a sale, title passed to the buyer, and the seller had no right to cancel or resell the balance goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>