<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 405 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358294</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the order reviewing the stay of demands for multiple assessment years under Section 220(6) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. The court found that the Commissioner of Income-Tax&#039;s decision to review the stay order was not justified as the appeals for the assessment years had been heard, and no final decision was made. The impugned order was set aside, and no costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 07:46:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 405 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358294</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the order reviewing the stay of demands for multiple assessment years under Section 220(6) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. The court found that the Commissioner of Income-Tax&#039;s decision to review the stay order was not justified as the appeals for the assessment years had been heard, and no final decision was made. The impugned order was set aside, and no costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>