<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 38 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12623</link>
    <description>Section 68 authorises addition of cash credits as income where the AO, on proper enquiry, is not satisfied about their genuineness; the assessee must prima facie establish the creditor&#039;s identity, creditworthiness, and transaction genuineness, and mere confirmatory letters are insufficient. Applying this standard, the HC held the Tribunal correctly distinguished one creditor&#039;s credit (supported by recorded statement, identified source of funds, and accounting entries) from the impugned credit in another creditor&#039;s name, where the onus was not shown to be conclusively discharged and further verification was warranted. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the addition for fresh enquiry rather than quash it was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 38 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12623</link>
      <description>Section 68 authorises addition of cash credits as income where the AO, on proper enquiry, is not satisfied about their genuineness; the assessee must prima facie establish the creditor&#039;s identity, creditworthiness, and transaction genuineness, and mere confirmatory letters are insufficient. Applying this standard, the HC held the Tribunal correctly distinguished one creditor&#039;s credit (supported by recorded statement, identified source of funds, and accounting entries) from the impugned credit in another creditor&#039;s name, where the onus was not shown to be conclusively discharged and further verification was warranted. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the addition for fresh enquiry rather than quash it was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>