https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358255 The court allowed the petitioners to maintain a joint writ petition but permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition concerning the second petitioner. The case involved the detention of goods under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax and the Kerala State Goods and Services Act due to document discrepancies. The court directed the second respondent to complete proceedings within a week and emphasized resolving the matter through established legal procedures rather than the writ petition. The judgment highlighted the need for the first petitioner to engage with the adjudicating authority to address the issues raised promptly. en-us Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358255 The court allowed the petitioners to maintain a joint writ petition but permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition concerning the second petitioner. The case involved the detention of goods under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax and the Kerala State Goods and Services Act due to document discrepancies. The court directed the second respondent to complete proceedings within a week and emphasized resolving the matter through established legal procedures rather than the writ petition. The judgment highlighted the need for the first petitioner to engage with the adjudicating authority to address the issues raised promptly. Case-Laws GST Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358255