<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 363 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358252</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside all demands and penalties against the appellant, including those based on transporter documents, alleged shortages of raw materials and finished goods, photocopies of invoices, and diary entries, as well as service tax liability on GTA services. The decisions were made due to the lack of substantial evidence and legal precedents emphasizing the necessity of tangible proof in cases involving alleged clandestine activities and service tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 363 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358252</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside all demands and penalties against the appellant, including those based on transporter documents, alleged shortages of raw materials and finished goods, photocopies of invoices, and diary entries, as well as service tax liability on GTA services. The decisions were made due to the lack of substantial evidence and legal precedents emphasizing the necessity of tangible proof in cases involving alleged clandestine activities and service tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>