<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 360 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358249</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi held that amounts payable as a condition of sale of imported goods are includible in assessable value under the Customs Valuation Rules. The 5% franchise fee, linked to the right to sell the imported goods and payable to related foreign suppliers as a sale condition, was correctly included. The 2% contribution toward institutional advertising and promotional campaigns was also upheld because it was required as a precondition for import and sale. However, the 3% advertising expenditure incurred in India after importation was not includible, as it was not shown to be a payment to satisfy a seller&#039;s obligation or a condition of sale; that loading was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 360 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358249</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi held that amounts payable as a condition of sale of imported goods are includible in assessable value under the Customs Valuation Rules. The 5% franchise fee, linked to the right to sell the imported goods and payable to related foreign suppliers as a sale condition, was correctly included. The 2% contribution toward institutional advertising and promotional campaigns was also upheld because it was required as a precondition for import and sale. However, the 3% advertising expenditure incurred in India after importation was not includible, as it was not shown to be a payment to satisfy a seller&#039;s obligation or a condition of sale; that loading was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>