<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 356 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358245</link>
    <description>The Tribunal acknowledged the injustice caused by the incorrect address issue leading to non-receipt of notices, recalling the ex-parte Order and restoring the appeal in its original number. The Tribunal attributed the mistake to the Revenue, ultimately deciding in favor of the applicant and allowing the condonation of delay application. The appeal was scheduled for regular hearing following the restoration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 07:44:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 356 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358245</link>
      <description>The Tribunal acknowledged the injustice caused by the incorrect address issue leading to non-receipt of notices, recalling the ex-parte Order and restoring the appeal in its original number. The Tribunal attributed the mistake to the Revenue, ultimately deciding in favor of the applicant and allowing the condonation of delay application. The appeal was scheduled for regular hearing following the restoration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>