https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358243 The tribunal upheld the demand for duty and penalties against the appellant company for engaging in clandestine removal of goods through parallel invoices and improper record-keeping. The denial of cross-examination rights was deemed justified due to concrete evidence supporting the allegations. The Commissioner (Appeal) affirmed the decision, concluding that the appellants knowingly participated in duty evasion, leading to the rejection of their appeals. en-us Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Apr 2018 11:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358243 The tribunal upheld the demand for duty and penalties against the appellant company for engaging in clandestine removal of goods through parallel invoices and improper record-keeping. The denial of cross-examination rights was deemed justified due to concrete evidence supporting the allegations. The Commissioner (Appeal) affirmed the decision, concluding that the appellants knowingly participated in duty evasion, leading to the rejection of their appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358243