<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1638 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200629</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s remand on the claim relating to provision for liquidated damages and warranty. It held that the issue should not be sent back to the CIT(A) and directed the Tribunal to decide the matter itself along with the connected appeals already pending before it. The operative effect was to consolidate adjudication of the dispute at the Tribunal stage rather than pursue a further remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 06:43:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1638 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200629</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s remand on the claim relating to provision for liquidated damages and warranty. It held that the issue should not be sent back to the CIT(A) and directed the Tribunal to decide the matter itself along with the connected appeals already pending before it. The operative effect was to consolidate adjudication of the dispute at the Tribunal stage rather than pursue a further remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>