<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (6) TMI 11 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200621</link>
    <description>The Assam Taxation (On Goods Carried by Roads or Inland Water-ways) Act, 1954, was upheld as constitutionally valid. The judgment concluded that the Act fell within the State Legislature&#039;s legislative competence, did not violate Article 301, did not infringe on fundamental rights under Article 19(1)(g), was not discriminatory under Article 14, and did not encroach on Union List entries. The petitions challenging the Act were dismissed, and the rules were discharged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2018 16:59:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (6) TMI 11 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200621</link>
      <description>The Assam Taxation (On Goods Carried by Roads or Inland Water-ways) Act, 1954, was upheld as constitutionally valid. The judgment concluded that the Act fell within the State Legislature&#039;s legislative competence, did not violate Article 301, did not infringe on fundamental rights under Article 19(1)(g), was not discriminatory under Article 14, and did not encroach on Union List entries. The petitions challenging the Act were dismissed, and the rules were discharged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>