https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200616 The court held that the plaintiffs were not entitled to sue for their share of the mortgage amount alone as the mortgage was indivisible. The suit was deemed incompetent due to the failure to implead a necessary party within the limitation period, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The decision affirmed that the suit was barred by limitation and could not be maintained solely for the plaintiffs' share. en-us Wed, 23 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Apr 2018 14:33:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200616 The court held that the plaintiffs were not entitled to sue for their share of the mortgage amount alone as the mortgage was indivisible. The suit was deemed incompetent due to the failure to implead a necessary party within the limitation period, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The decision affirmed that the suit was barred by limitation and could not be maintained solely for the plaintiffs' share. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200616