<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 345 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358234</link>
    <description>The HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondent to release the detained motor vehicle chassis. Despite initial documentation concerns, the court found the KVATIS system declarations valid. The goods were to be released immediately, with the adjudicating authority tasked to determine potential penalties within two weeks, ensuring procedural compliance with CGST Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 345 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358234</link>
      <description>The HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondent to release the detained motor vehicle chassis. Despite initial documentation concerns, the court found the KVATIS system declarations valid. The goods were to be released immediately, with the adjudicating authority tasked to determine potential penalties within two weeks, ensuring procedural compliance with CGST Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>