<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 344 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358233</link>
    <description>HC ruled on goods detention under CGST/SGST Acts, finding procedural irregularities. Despite Form KER II website unavailability, the court directed respondents to complete adjudication within a week, considering petitioner&#039;s manual declaration and online Form KER I submission. The court left open potential future challenges to statutory rules while emphasizing prompt resolution of the detention issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 344 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358233</link>
      <description>HC ruled on goods detention under CGST/SGST Acts, finding procedural irregularities. Despite Form KER II website unavailability, the court directed respondents to complete adjudication within a week, considering petitioner&#039;s manual declaration and online Form KER I submission. The court left open potential future challenges to statutory rules while emphasizing prompt resolution of the detention issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>