<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 343 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358232</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities in a case involving disallowance under Section 40(A)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and alleged undisclosed income through bogus credits. The court found no substantial question of law in the tax deductibility of reimbursements claimed by the assessee organization or in the additions made under Section 68 of the Act, as the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to support their claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2018 06:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 343 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358232</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities in a case involving disallowance under Section 40(A)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and alleged undisclosed income through bogus credits. The court found no substantial question of law in the tax deductibility of reimbursements claimed by the assessee organization or in the additions made under Section 68 of the Act, as the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to support their claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>