<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 37 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12609</link>
    <description>The High Court of Kerala ruled that the interest payment by the assessee to the vendor was not eligible for deduction as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the assessee was not engaged in real estate business and did not acquire significant land title. The court disallowed the deduction, siding with the Revenue. Additionally, the court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s authority to rectify orders under section 256(1) for the purpose of ensuring justice, based on a prior judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:29:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 37 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12609</link>
      <description>The High Court of Kerala ruled that the interest payment by the assessee to the vendor was not eligible for deduction as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the assessee was not engaged in real estate business and did not acquire significant land title. The court disallowed the deduction, siding with the Revenue. Additionally, the court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s authority to rectify orders under section 256(1) for the purpose of ensuring justice, based on a prior judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>