<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 333 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358222</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in both cases. The Tribunal found the explanations provided by the assessee regarding the nature of transactions and the absence of TDS liability to be reasonable and consistent with previous rulings. The cross objection by the assessee was also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2018 07:57:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 333 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358222</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in both cases. The Tribunal found the explanations provided by the assessee regarding the nature of transactions and the absence of TDS liability to be reasonable and consistent with previous rulings. The cross objection by the assessee was also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>