<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 34 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12608</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to restore the reference application dismissed as time-barred, citing the Tribunal&#039;s inherent power to correct its mistakes. The maintainability of the reference case referred by the Tribunal was affirmed, with the Court dismissing the assessee&#039;s challenge. Regarding the addition of unexplained investments in the name of minor children, the Court found the Tribunal&#039;s order for further investigation unjustified. Similarly, the addition of unexplained wealth in the name of the assessee&#039;s minor son was upheld, as the source of the wealth was not established satisfactorily. Ultimately, the Court ruled in favor of the Department in both instances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:26:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 34 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12608</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to restore the reference application dismissed as time-barred, citing the Tribunal&#039;s inherent power to correct its mistakes. The maintainability of the reference case referred by the Tribunal was affirmed, with the Court dismissing the assessee&#039;s challenge. Regarding the addition of unexplained investments in the name of minor children, the Court found the Tribunal&#039;s order for further investigation unjustified. Similarly, the addition of unexplained wealth in the name of the assessee&#039;s minor son was upheld, as the source of the wealth was not established satisfactorily. Ultimately, the Court ruled in favor of the Department in both instances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>