<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 324 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to re-evaluate the assessee&#039;s claims and re-adjudicate based on statutory provisions and CBDT notifications. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for proper consideration of evidence and adherence to procedural requirements in determining eligibility for deductions under section 10A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2018 07:57:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 324 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to re-evaluate the assessee&#039;s claims and re-adjudicate based on statutory provisions and CBDT notifications. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for proper consideration of evidence and adherence to procedural requirements in determining eligibility for deductions under section 10A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>