<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 315 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358204</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, finding the AO failed to justify the disallowance of commission payments made to the assessee&#039;s sons for business purposes. The ITAT held that the AO did not establish the excessiveness or unreasonableness of the payments and failed to gather market data. Additionally, the ITAT noted the lack of proper assessment by the AO regarding the applicability of relevant provisions, ultimately leading to a premature addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2018 07:56:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 315 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358204</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, finding the AO failed to justify the disallowance of commission payments made to the assessee&#039;s sons for business purposes. The ITAT held that the AO did not establish the excessiveness or unreasonableness of the payments and failed to gather market data. Additionally, the ITAT noted the lack of proper assessment by the AO regarding the applicability of relevant provisions, ultimately leading to a premature addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>