<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 301 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358190</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed by the court, remanding the case back to the original authority for a fresh decision. The court held that the appellant was not providing intermediary services but consulting engineering services and Business Auxiliary Services, falling under the definition of export of service. The judgment emphasized compliance with principles of natural justice and provided an opportunity for the appellant to present documentary evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2018 07:55:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 301 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358190</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed by the court, remanding the case back to the original authority for a fresh decision. The court held that the appellant was not providing intermediary services but consulting engineering services and Business Auxiliary Services, falling under the definition of export of service. The judgment emphasized compliance with principles of natural justice and provided an opportunity for the appellant to present documentary evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>