<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 300 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358189</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order disallowing the refund and interest on the sanctioned amount in an appeal against the Commissioner(Appeals)&#039;s decision. Citing relevant cases and legal provisions, the Tribunal emphasized the entitlement to interest on CENVAT credit refunds. Relying on Supreme Court precedents, the Tribunal held that the impugned order was not legally sustainable. As a result, the appellant&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the order disallowing the refund and interest was overturned on 21/02/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 14:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 300 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358189</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order disallowing the refund and interest on the sanctioned amount in an appeal against the Commissioner(Appeals)&#039;s decision. Citing relevant cases and legal provisions, the Tribunal emphasized the entitlement to interest on CENVAT credit refunds. Relying on Supreme Court precedents, the Tribunal held that the impugned order was not legally sustainable. As a result, the appellant&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the order disallowing the refund and interest was overturned on 21/02/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>