https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358182 The High Court held that the Tribunal's concurrent factual finding, reached after remand on the material on record, that the assessee had no manufacturing activity and no factory was not perverse. As the finding was a pure question of fact and no perversity was shown, no substantial question of law arose for appellate interference. The Tribunal's finding was therefore upheld and the appeal was not entertained on merits. en-us Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Apr 2018 07:55:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358182 The High Court held that the Tribunal's concurrent factual finding, reached after remand on the material on record, that the assessee had no manufacturing activity and no factory was not perverse. As the finding was a pure question of fact and no perversity was shown, no substantial question of law arose for appellate interference. The Tribunal's finding was therefore upheld and the appeal was not entertained on merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358182