<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 291 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358180</link>
    <description>The appellate authority confirmed demands totaling Rs. 4,47,283 based on evidence of irregularities in invoices, excess quantity in invoices, and shortages of finished goods. Demands for excess consumption of scrap and discrepancies in reports were set aside due to lack of proof. Penalties were imposed based on confirmed demands and individual roles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2018 07:55:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 291 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358180</link>
      <description>The appellate authority confirmed demands totaling Rs. 4,47,283 based on evidence of irregularities in invoices, excess quantity in invoices, and shortages of finished goods. Demands for excess consumption of scrap and discrepancies in reports were set aside due to lack of proof. Penalties were imposed based on confirmed demands and individual roles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>