<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 288 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358177</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand to include the subsidy amount in the Transaction Value for duty payment. The decision was based on the interpretation of Transaction Value, distinguishing the case from the Super Synotex judgement and aligning with the treatment of subsidy amounts in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2018 07:55:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 288 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358177</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand to include the subsidy amount in the Transaction Value for duty payment. The decision was based on the interpretation of Transaction Value, distinguishing the case from the Super Synotex judgement and aligning with the treatment of subsidy amounts in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>