<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1301 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200606</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI remanded the case to the original authority for de-novo adjudication on clandestine manufacture and non-receipt of goods by ultimate buyers, based on a previous Tribunal order. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter involving multiple manufacturers and traders, including the present appellant, linked to a seized diary, is to be decided afresh by the original authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 21:07:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1301 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200606</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI remanded the case to the original authority for de-novo adjudication on clandestine manufacture and non-receipt of goods by ultimate buyers, based on a previous Tribunal order. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter involving multiple manufacturers and traders, including the present appellant, linked to a seized diary, is to be decided afresh by the original authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>