https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200592 Executive instructions governing leave and other service conditions, framed as conditions for grant-in-aid to private colleges, were treated as non-statutory and therefore not enforceable as legal rights. Because the instructions regulated the terms on which the State extended financial aid, their effect remained a matter between the State and college management, and teachers could not invoke Article 226 to compel or restrain their implementation. Acceptance of the grant conditions by the Governing Body did not create an enforceable right in teachers, and no writ of mandamus lay where the rules had no statutory force. The High Court's direction preventing effect to the March 20, 1962 letter was therefore held erroneous. en-us Tue, 27 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Apr 2018 15:38:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200592 Executive instructions governing leave and other service conditions, framed as conditions for grant-in-aid to private colleges, were treated as non-statutory and therefore not enforceable as legal rights. Because the instructions regulated the terms on which the State extended financial aid, their effect remained a matter between the State and college management, and teachers could not invoke Article 226 to compel or restrain their implementation. Acceptance of the grant conditions by the Governing Body did not create an enforceable right in teachers, and no writ of mandamus lay where the rules had no statutory force. The High Court's direction preventing effect to the March 20, 1962 letter was therefore held erroneous. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200592