<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Directors&#039; Foreign Travel Expenses Denied as Deductions Due to Lack of Business Purpose Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38774</link>
    <description>Disallowance of foreign travelling expenses of Directors - Assessee may have started a new line of business, but the particular visit of London does not appear to be for the purpose of business sans any supporting evidence like, any kind of correspondence, agreement, exchange of mails, etc. Mere stating that the directors have met one doctor and that to be one name has been given will not suffice. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 15:24:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 15:24:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Directors&#039; Foreign Travel Expenses Denied as Deductions Due to Lack of Business Purpose Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38774</link>
      <description>Disallowance of foreign travelling expenses of Directors - Assessee may have started a new line of business, but the particular visit of London does not appear to be for the purpose of business sans any supporting evidence like, any kind of correspondence, agreement, exchange of mails, etc. Mere stating that the directors have met one doctor and that to be one name has been given will not suffice. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 15:24:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>