<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (2) TMI 122 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200590</link>
    <description>A tenancy created by holding over under Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act is a fresh statutory tenancy, so a notice-dispensing clause in the original lease does not automatically carry forward to the renewed tenancy. In the absence of a specific agreement applicable to the holding-over tenancy, termination must comply with Section 106; for a manufacturing lease, that requires six months&#039; notice expiring with the year of tenancy. Waiver of the right to challenge a defective quit notice requires intentional and conscious relinquishment of a known right, and cannot be inferred merely from silence or delayed pleading. On these principles, valid statutory notice remained necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 15:09:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (2) TMI 122 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200590</link>
      <description>A tenancy created by holding over under Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act is a fresh statutory tenancy, so a notice-dispensing clause in the original lease does not automatically carry forward to the renewed tenancy. In the absence of a specific agreement applicable to the holding-over tenancy, termination must comply with Section 106; for a manufacturing lease, that requires six months&#039; notice expiring with the year of tenancy. Waiver of the right to challenge a defective quit notice requires intentional and conscious relinquishment of a known right, and cannot be inferred merely from silence or delayed pleading. On these principles, valid statutory notice remained necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>