<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 261 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358150</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in a case involving the justification of deleting the addition of interest claimed on an outstanding loan under Section 24(b) of the Income Tax Act for A.Y. 2011-12. The Tribunal ruled that subsequent loans taken to repay the original loan are covered under Section 24(b) and supported the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the AO. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the treatment of Long Term Capital Loss as Short Term Capital Gains and its classification as a business loss, affirming that the conversion of capital assets into stock-in-trade was permissible under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 07:46:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 261 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358150</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in a case involving the justification of deleting the addition of interest claimed on an outstanding loan under Section 24(b) of the Income Tax Act for A.Y. 2011-12. The Tribunal ruled that subsequent loans taken to repay the original loan are covered under Section 24(b) and supported the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the AO. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the treatment of Long Term Capital Loss as Short Term Capital Gains and its classification as a business loss, affirming that the conversion of capital assets into stock-in-trade was permissible under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>