<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 258 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358147</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete additions totaling &amp;amp;8377; 73,67,360 for the assessment year 2005-06. The dispute over TDS u/s 40(a)(ia) centered on payments to CONCOR for goods carriage, with the court ruling that TDS was not applicable as the payments were for goods carriage by Railways, falling outside TDS provisions. The judgment favored the assessee, upholding that no TDS was required, resulting in the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 07:46:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 258 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358147</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete additions totaling &amp;amp;8377; 73,67,360 for the assessment year 2005-06. The dispute over TDS u/s 40(a)(ia) centered on payments to CONCOR for goods carriage, with the court ruling that TDS was not applicable as the payments were for goods carriage by Railways, falling outside TDS provisions. The judgment favored the assessee, upholding that no TDS was required, resulting in the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>