<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 253 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358142</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds, upholding the decisions made by the CIT(A) in each case. This included disallowance under sections 35(2AB) and 14A of the Income Tax Act, excess depreciation on office equipment, sales promotion expenses, and motor car depreciation. The Tribunal emphasized that approvals and business use were crucial factors in determining disallowances, ultimately affirming the lower court&#039;s rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 07:46:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 253 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358142</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds, upholding the decisions made by the CIT(A) in each case. This included disallowance under sections 35(2AB) and 14A of the Income Tax Act, excess depreciation on office equipment, sales promotion expenses, and motor car depreciation. The Tribunal emphasized that approvals and business use were crucial factors in determining disallowances, ultimately affirming the lower court&#039;s rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>