<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 251 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358140</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both assessment years, directing the deletion of disallowances under section 40(a)(ia) and the proper consideration of losses for carry forward. The judgment emphasized that the payments for water supply were transactions of sale, not work contracts, and thus not subject to TDS under section 194C.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 07:46:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 251 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358140</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both assessment years, directing the deletion of disallowances under section 40(a)(ia) and the proper consideration of losses for carry forward. The judgment emphasized that the payments for water supply were transactions of sale, not work contracts, and thus not subject to TDS under section 194C.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>