<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 17 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12593</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that section 52(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 did not apply. The fair market value of the property at Rs. 11 lakhs, as declared by the assessee or shown in the sale deed, was accepted. The decision aligned with the precedent established in K.P. Varghese v. ITO [1981] 131 ITR 597.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 13:29:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 17 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12593</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that section 52(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 did not apply. The fair market value of the property at Rs. 11 lakhs, as declared by the assessee or shown in the sale deed, was accepted. The decision aligned with the precedent established in K.P. Varghese v. ITO [1981] 131 ITR 597.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>