<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 209 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358098</link>
    <description>Concurrent findings that the audit did not establish purchase suppression or sales suppression, and that the stock discrepancy was negligible, justified deletion of the proposed input tax credit reversal on scrap sales. The HC held that the dealer&#039;s sale of finished goods and scrap on first sale, with tax paid after adjusting input tax credit, did not raise any substantial question of law for interference in tax revision. On that basis, the challenge to reopening the assessment failed and the revisions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 07:43:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 209 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358098</link>
      <description>Concurrent findings that the audit did not establish purchase suppression or sales suppression, and that the stock discrepancy was negligible, justified deletion of the proposed input tax credit reversal on scrap sales. The HC held that the dealer&#039;s sale of finished goods and scrap on first sale, with tax paid after adjusting input tax credit, did not raise any substantial question of law for interference in tax revision. On that basis, the challenge to reopening the assessment failed and the revisions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>