<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 208 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358097</link>
    <description>Under the Tamil Nadu Additional Sales Tax Act, principal-agent consignment sales are aggregated with the principal&#039;s taxable turnover for determining liability, and additional sales tax applies when the statutory threshold is crossed. To avoid liability, the assessee had to produce valid official certificates or equally reliable proof showing that the principals&#039; turnover already included the relevant sales and that the tax had been paid. The Tribunal found the letters produced were not dependable evidence, and there was no perversity in that factual assessment. The revision was therefore rejected and the Tribunal&#039;s finding of liability was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 07:43:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 208 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358097</link>
      <description>Under the Tamil Nadu Additional Sales Tax Act, principal-agent consignment sales are aggregated with the principal&#039;s taxable turnover for determining liability, and additional sales tax applies when the statutory threshold is crossed. To avoid liability, the assessee had to produce valid official certificates or equally reliable proof showing that the principals&#039; turnover already included the relevant sales and that the tax had been paid. The Tribunal found the letters produced were not dependable evidence, and there was no perversity in that factual assessment. The revision was therefore rejected and the Tribunal&#039;s finding of liability was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>