<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 206 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358095</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Writ Petition challenging the tender decision, emphasizing compliance with tender conditions in determining the lowest bidder and the importance of timely challenges. The judgment highlighted the need to adhere to specified criteria for selecting the lowest bidder and underscored the integrity of the tender process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 206 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358095</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Writ Petition challenging the tender decision, emphasizing compliance with tender conditions in determining the lowest bidder and the importance of timely challenges. The judgment highlighted the need to adhere to specified criteria for selecting the lowest bidder and underscored the integrity of the tender process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>