<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 195 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358084</link>
    <description>The court set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order on the petitioner&#039;s stay application, directing no recovery proceedings until appeal disposal. Allegations of misconduct were noted, urging CBDT investigation. CIT(A) lacks explicit power to stay demand but possesses inherent powers. CBDT tasked to ensure fair administration. Appeal dismissed, no costs ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 08:24:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 195 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358084</link>
      <description>The court set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order on the petitioner&#039;s stay application, directing no recovery proceedings until appeal disposal. Allegations of misconduct were noted, urging CBDT investigation. CIT(A) lacks explicit power to stay demand but possesses inherent powers. CBDT tasked to ensure fair administration. Appeal dismissed, no costs ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>