<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 191 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358080</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed as no substantial question of law arose from the findings of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal. The judgment reiterated that penalties under Section 271(1)(c) were not applicable to an assessee taxed under Section 115JB, emphasizing the legal distinction between assessments under different provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 08:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 191 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358080</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed as no substantial question of law arose from the findings of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal. The judgment reiterated that penalties under Section 271(1)(c) were not applicable to an assessee taxed under Section 115JB, emphasizing the legal distinction between assessments under different provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>