<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 177 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358066</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of interest expenses and addition of notional interest income for assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The assessee&#039;s failure to establish business expediency for lending at lower or no interest led to the dismissal of appeals. The Tribunal found that loans were given from borrowed funds without sufficient justification, in contrast to the business nature. The decisions of lower authorities were affirmed, and the appeals were deemed meritless.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 08:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 177 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358066</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of interest expenses and addition of notional interest income for assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The assessee&#039;s failure to establish business expediency for lending at lower or no interest led to the dismissal of appeals. The Tribunal found that loans were given from borrowed funds without sufficient justification, in contrast to the business nature. The decisions of lower authorities were affirmed, and the appeals were deemed meritless.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>