<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 154 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358043</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the decision disallowing CENVAT credit on the courier bill of entry. The judgment emphasized the importance of legal precedent and the interpretation of relevant rules in determining the eligibility of credit claims, ultimately providing relief to the appellant based on established legal principles and previous Tribunal decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 08:22:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 154 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358043</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the decision disallowing CENVAT credit on the courier bill of entry. The judgment emphasized the importance of legal precedent and the interpretation of relevant rules in determining the eligibility of credit claims, ultimately providing relief to the appellant based on established legal principles and previous Tribunal decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>