<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 151 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358040</link>
    <description>Endorsed Bills of Entry were treated as sufficient documents for availing CENVAT credit on imported goods cleared from customs and directly shifted to the factory, following earlier precedent on the same issue. On that basis, the contrary view in the impugned order was not sustained, and the credit was held admissible. The demand, interest and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 18:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 151 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358040</link>
      <description>Endorsed Bills of Entry were treated as sufficient documents for availing CENVAT credit on imported goods cleared from customs and directly shifted to the factory, following earlier precedent on the same issue. On that basis, the contrary view in the impugned order was not sustained, and the credit was held admissible. The demand, interest and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>