<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1570 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200567</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Transfer Pricing (TP) documentation rejection was relieved, directing a reworking of margins. Adjustments on transactions with non-AEs were limited to AE transactions only. The computation of margins under TNMM and working capital adjustments were directed to be re-examined. Certain comparables were excluded or remitted for further examination. The appellant&#039;s margin was within ALP after adjustments, rendering the risk differences issue academic. The tribunal directed consideration of the proviso to Section 92C(2) for ALP adjustments. Deduction u/s. 10A was to be reexamined, and capitalization of license fees adjusted. Refund verification was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 08:20:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1570 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200567</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Transfer Pricing (TP) documentation rejection was relieved, directing a reworking of margins. Adjustments on transactions with non-AEs were limited to AE transactions only. The computation of margins under TNMM and working capital adjustments were directed to be re-examined. Certain comparables were excluded or remitted for further examination. The appellant&#039;s margin was within ALP after adjustments, rendering the risk differences issue academic. The tribunal directed consideration of the proviso to Section 92C(2) for ALP adjustments. Deduction u/s. 10A was to be reexamined, and capitalization of license fees adjusted. Refund verification was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>