https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200559 A statutory power to continue, cancel or extend a temple notification under section 64(4) was treated as quasi-judicial because it affected the trustee's rights in the same way as the original notification process. The text states that, just as notice, objections, enquiry and a reasoned decision were required before an initial notification under sections 63 and 64(1) to 64(3), the same natural justice requirements applied to action under section 64(4). Notice and an opportunity of hearing were therefore mandatory, and the impugned notification was invalid for want of hearing. en-us Wed, 10 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Apr 2018 16:08:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200559 A statutory power to continue, cancel or extend a temple notification under section 64(4) was treated as quasi-judicial because it affected the trustee's rights in the same way as the original notification process. The text states that, just as notice, objections, enquiry and a reasoned decision were required before an initial notification under sections 63 and 64(1) to 64(3), the same natural justice requirements applied to action under section 64(4). Notice and an opportunity of hearing were therefore mandatory, and the impugned notification was invalid for want of hearing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200559