<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cricket player not liable for service tax; wearing team gear isn&#039;t considered brand promotion, says court.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38739</link>
    <description>Revenue entertained a view that the appellant was promoting activities of the franchisee by wearing franchisee&#039;s official cricket clothing, displaying franchisee&#039;s mark/ logo etc. which was nothing but akin to promotion or marketing of the logo/ brands/ marks of the franchisee/ sponsor - No service was provided by the player, nor requiring him to discharge any service tax. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 06:58:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 06:58:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cricket player not liable for service tax; wearing team gear isn&#039;t considered brand promotion, says court.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38739</link>
      <description>Revenue entertained a view that the appellant was promoting activities of the franchisee by wearing franchisee&#039;s official cricket clothing, displaying franchisee&#039;s mark/ logo etc. which was nothing but akin to promotion or marketing of the logo/ brands/ marks of the franchisee/ sponsor - No service was provided by the player, nor requiring him to discharge any service tax. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 06:58:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>