<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 37 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12568</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 147 cannot be initiated on a mere change of opinion on material already examined in a completed scrutiny assessment. A valid reopening requires a rational basis for &quot;reason to believe&quot; founded on fresh material, external information, or a change in law; the provision does not confer a power of review on the Assessing Officer. An assessment under section 143(3) carries a presumption of application of mind, and the absence of detailed reasons in the assessment order does not, by itself, justify reopening. On these principles, reopening based only on a fresh appraisal of the same facts is impermissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:01:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 37 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12568</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 147 cannot be initiated on a mere change of opinion on material already examined in a completed scrutiny assessment. A valid reopening requires a rational basis for &quot;reason to believe&quot; founded on fresh material, external information, or a change in law; the provision does not confer a power of review on the Assessing Officer. An assessment under section 143(3) carries a presumption of application of mind, and the absence of detailed reasons in the assessment order does not, by itself, justify reopening. On these principles, reopening based only on a fresh appraisal of the same facts is impermissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>